Films are like trees – every tip of every branch should all originate back to the same root

The Carrot Kid -Website Self Portrait
Name: Paul Whittington
Age: 35
Lives: Vancouver Island, Canada
Occupation: semiprofessional, I guess.
I do make money from my films through DVD sales,
festivals, and licensing fees.
I also do a little freelance camera work and editing
for a few producers I know.
Think of animated films and the mind immediately jumps to the computer generated extravagance’s of Disney and Pixar.
But you don’t have to have a big budget and complex computer programming to turn what stirs in the imagination into animated films that are inventive, original gems.
Canadian film maker Paul Whittington -proves that with his dazzling collection of shorts
If you can do this with a bunch of carrots then the world is indeed your oyster.
The Juiced Carrots from Carrotkid on Vimeo.
Fattalent asked him about the making of The juiced carrots -which seemed likely to have been an extremely messy process
The Juiced Carrots was an extremely fun film for me to make and I was quite pleased with the outcome of it. And yes, it was a very messy film shoot!
The Juiced Carrots is the third film of my Kitchen Trilogy so by the time I got the filming it I pretty much had the style down. It was also an experimental film so I didn’t do too much planning ahead of time – basically the only things I knew before filming was that I’d be juicing carrots, that it would contain the same audio/visual style as the first two films, and that the film would end in irony wherein all the efforts of the character would have been for nothing (all three films contain this theme). I also knew that in some way the film had to reveal a vampire-like theme wherein carrot juice is the life-blood and that the killing of the carrots equaled the survival of the character.
With those things in mind, first came the filming of the carrot preparation. As I filmed this sequence a bunch of ideas came to me for other shots that would be great for the film – that was when I came up with the carrot conveyor belt idea.
When I got up to the juicing of the carrots I still had no solid idea how I would visually represent the bloody slaughter of the carrots. However, I did know I wanted to film a POV shot of the measuring cup as the juice poured into it. To film that shot I had to position the juicer directly above a sheet of glass so that the juice would hit the glass with the camera directly under the glass filming it.
The shot worked great but seconds later the juice began to leak from the rim that was taped to the glass and pour out onto the floor! I quickly pulled the camera away to prevent it from getting covered in juice which was now dripping all over the floor and splashing everywhere. And as I was watching this happen, it hit me! I knew exactly how I needed to film the carrot bloodshed.
I started juicing cup after cup of carrot juice and then filmed many shots of it pouring, dripping and splashing all over the floor. It was one heck of a mess to clean up but the results were great. Then came the idea for the carrot pulp cockroaches scattering about as they rush to escape the slaughter.
The process of filming this film was somewhat basic – film some shots stop-motion, film some shots pixilation, and film the rest live-action – just make sure to film as many shots as I can, from as many different angles as possible and then put it all together in post. That’s where a film like this is really made – in post. Once I had all the shots filmed I then slowly worked to mold the footage into something that is fun, fast paced, experimental, and even somewhat compressible, lol. Then comes the recording of all the audio – I record all the foley and sound effects myself separately and then add them in one at a time, trying out different sounds in different places until everything sounds right (they really help to bring the film to life).
Aftermath in the Kitchen
Do you always work on the soundtrack after the edit or before?
I usually work on the soundtrack during the edit (especially for my experimental films). For a lot of my scenes the visual and the sound are one and the same so it’s always much more effective in bringing the film to life and merging shots/scenes together when the audio/visual are cut together at the same time. And whenever it’s possible I like to make the music tracks before the edit because they help out during the edit as well in determining things like: length of shots, choosing the right shots, transitions, and also what the foley/SFX sounds like on top of the music.
How did your interest in animation, & stop-frame in particular, begin -and what equipment do you use to produce these wonderful films?
I’ve had a long time interest in stop-motion since I was a kid. I think it first started right after seeing ‘Clash of The Titans’ on the big screen back in 1981. I was just so fascinated with the look of stop-motion from that film I could never get it out of my head.
Still From: Clash of the Titains
I would make stop-motion films with an old super8 camera (back then video cameras were as large as they were expensive and they came in 3 pieces) animating Lego and toys. But it wasn’t until about 2003 that I began to animate again and I’ve enjoyed it so much that I try to incorporate it into as many of my films as possible (even the live-action ones).
Paul at work on a recent film
The equipment I use always changes. New cameras come out and so I try to upgrade as much as possible. Sometimes I’ll discover a cool piece of equipment I think I can use and so I’ll purchase it. And whenever possible I will construct equipment such as rigs and stabilizers to be used for certain shots in a film.
Camera rig used during the production of “Letter / Box”
A seesaw battle between a letter and a box.
Animation of this kind takes a lot of patience not too mention concentration – did you find it easy when you first started or completely frustrating?
Actually I didn’t seem to find it very frustrating at all – there is always a handful of shots in every film I make that drive me up the wall trying to figure out how to film them correctly but for the most part things go quite smoothly. I am a huge stickler for planning before shooting (storyboards, test shots, ect), so when it does come time to actually film the shot things almost always go according to plan. Then there are my experimental films like ‘The Kitchen Trilogy’ and ‘Inanimate Objects’ in which I don’t do a lot of planning but rather make things up as I go – but even those ‘made up’ sequences in themselves are planned for as well – when thinking up those types of films I will have areas where I plan not to plan so that the process of experimental filmmaking helps to better form the final outcome of the film in a sort of chaotic way.
Still from: “Inanimate Objects”
I think I would completely loose track of where I was up to so do you minutely story board everything?
It’s strange – some films I storyboard and some I do not. I usually storyboard more for live-action than I do stop-motion. With stop-motion, you have all day to film only one shot so you have plenty of time to play around and figure out the framing, camera angle, and playout of the shot. With live-action you film one shot right after the other so storyboarding entire scenes can save you loads of time during a shoot. But I will storyboard certain shots even for stop-motion if they are complex or contain post-visual effects.
Android 207 -model used in filming.
The thing I really like about your work is that things are real -unlike computer generated animation which I find incredibly plastic no matter how clever -any views on CG?
Yes, I couldn’t agree with you more. I’ve always preferred the esthetics of that which is real over that which is not (such as CGI). I think most people do as well whether they realize it or not. CGI is extremely overrated – and even more so on the amateur side than the pro side (I think most pros know enough not to use it unless they really need too). Not that one could not make a very beautiful film using CGI, it can and has been done – NFB’s ‘Ryan’ is a great example. But in general it is best to treat CGI for what it really is – a tool to be used only when needed. If you plan to use CGI keep these two things in mind: when CGI is used correctly in a film the viewer will not even realize they are seeing it – however, it is ok to use CGI as a form of visual style too, just make sure it looks bloody good.
Have you been influenced by any animators and which other animation films do you like?
I do have many influences when it comes to film, however most of them are not to do with stop-motion. I have had quite a few people compare some of my work to Brothers Quay which I don’t understand at all. I do like Brothers Quay but their style is very different than mine and they influence me in no way – any similaries between my films and theirs are simply coincidental. One of my favorite filmmakers of all time is Jan Svankmajer – and I can tell you that he is a definite influence on some of the elements that go into my films. I also like his attitude and approach towards film – very open and free with his ideas, not afraid to show what needs to be shown, great sense of humor in his work, and his films always contain the perfect blend of mainstream and experimental. I have learned so much from watching his films. Another favorite is Norman McLaren and two of his films in particular -Neighbors’ and ‘Sphere’.
Other films containing animation that I like are: Alice, Darkness Lightness Darkness, Manly Games, Conspirators of Pleasure, Clash of The Titans, Jason and The Argonauts, The Wall, The Fantastic Planet, Ryan.
What advice would you give to any aspiring film maker who having seen your superb work says ” I wanna do that!”?
I would say “Go for it”, just remember to keep it real – real to your emotional intuition when expressing each element of the film. Style, mood, atmosphere, story, plot, character, sounds, all need to reflect a specific form of emotion that only you can determine. Also, films are like trees – every tip of every branch all originate back to the same root (as does everything in our entire universe). That root is the spark that sets the whole film in motion – anything you put in your film that does not originate back to that root is nothing more than a broken branch. The root can be anything at all: a thought, idea, situation, character, event, a word, object, expression – anything. And whether the root is transparent to the audience or not is irrelevant, just so long as it’s there.
Head in waiting
Paul’s films have won him no fewer than 13 awards at festivals
Of all the awards you have received, which to you do you prize the most?
Hmmm, that’s a tough question for me. In general, when it comes to film, I don’t have much of an interest in awards – my focus is more on how individual people perceive my work rather than how good or bad a collective whole deems it to be. However, awards do have their advantages – the more of them you get the better your chances are for advancing your film career – they help strengthen your portfolio. But don’t get me wrong, it’s always nice to win an award for my film work, I just don’t seem to cherish them as much as perhaps I should. So to answer the question, I guess I prize them all equally.
One thing for sure, a talent like Paul deserves everyone of them!!
Three of Paul’s films can be seen on Fat Talent in the video section.
All of his work can be found on www.orangecorefilms.com
Buy a DVD featuring some of his best films from his store
- a ‘must have’ for any serious film enthusiast.
Great thanks: to Paul for sharing, helping and giving some of his time.
Interview: john warwick





























































